Chapter 4 Reflection: Typography Legibility
Chapter 4 was all about legibility in type, which according
to the book is widely misunderstood and often neglected by designers. The book
mentions that the main three qualities to look for when selecting a typeface in
terms of legibility are contrast, simplicity, and proportion. Originally when I would think about type
legibility I would think about in terms of books. But after reading this
chapter, I realized that it is also very important think about it whenever you
are using type in a design. One thing that I found interesting was the example
on page 77 where they showed a word split in half, to represent how it is easier
to read the upper halves of words compared reading only the bottom halves of
words. This was something that I never really had considered, but from the
example it became very clear to me that visually we distinguish letters from
the top. In one part of the chapter they talked about how traditionally serif
typefaces are more legible because the offer more character definition. This
was one part within the reading that I did not agree with, I have found that
for me sans serif fonts are much easier to read. I think that this may be part
of my generation. We grew up really more sans serif fonts, while it was more
common years ago to read and use serif fonts. One thing that I found very
helpful throughout the entire chapter was the author’s use of examples. Many
times when they were trying to explain different concepts about typography
legibility, they would incorporate into the text. This was shown when trying to
explain capital verses lowercase letters, line length, weight, color, and
justified versus unjustified text. This was really helpful for me to be to see
a visual within the text it really helped me understand what they were talking
about. This was the same case in the last section of the chapter where they
were talking about typographic details. It was helpful to be able to see what
the recommended verses the not recommended rules within the terms of typography
details.
No comments:
Post a Comment