Chapter 4 of Typographic
Design: Form and Communication thoroughly dives into the concept of legibility,
and presents an interesting conclusion. To begin, I'll comment on just how
fluid and relative legibility really is to the current state and priorities of
culture. The efficiency and fast-paced mentality of today's society has, of
course, defined a unique set of rules for communicating content effectively and
efficiently.
The chapter describes
letters by having vertical strokes, curved strokes, a combination of both, or
by being oblique. Playing off of these classifications, it is also noted that
the upper halves of letters are often more distinguished than the bottom
halves. Reading, of course, involves much more than this. Word shape and
internal patterns – two properties of a more catch-all term, word structure,
for overall word composition – as well as interletter spacing (a crucial key to
beautiful and legible type) predict how smoothly type can be read.
There is a trinity of
spatial harmony: size, line length, and interline spacing/leading. Optically
speaking, a reader may be twelve to fourteen inches away from a given page, and
the above elements are brought up in the chapter as a means to harmony,
relaxation, and balanced content delivery. For example, a font size larger than
twelve point may result in a reader taking too long to take in the text – it
covers a larger surface area for mastication – but going too much smaller can
obviously cause the reader to spend extra time squinting. Similarly, weight and
stroke too light or too heavy increases tension, ambiguity, and distraction;
type color without enough contrast to background color does not stand out
enough for efficient legibility; or alignment with extremely jagged edging will
break apart the rhythm.
While on the subject,
alignment was given a historical to present timeline. In the 1920's,
justification was arguably the most common and it prevented the jagged edge
problem. Today, the justified versus unjustified alignment argument is still
carrying on, but unjustified has definitely pulled slightly ahead and
asymmetrical text is an accepted norm. The fact is, as the chapter insinuates
through all of the covered details, legibility is truly a tug of war between
creative impact and optical/typographical theory that must be considered when
designing or publishing. Balance between the plaintext and the bold, oblique,
distorted, or covered means knowing when your message is clear and your content
is readable, and when you've gone too far and distorted your very message and readability.
As a designer, this chapter reminded me of the basics: what am I saying with my
work, and how effective am I at giving the reader something they can
understand?
Image source: http://xsvision.net/?mod=4
No comments:
Post a Comment